Responsible Researcher

PD Dr. Peter Collin
Peter Collin
Researcher
Phone: +49 (69) 789 78 - 258
Fax: +49 (69) 789 78 - 169

Related Research

Research Project | Department II

Schiedsstaatlichkeit

Balancing of State and Private Interests by Arbitral Institutions in the Germany of the German Empire and the Weimar Republic

From the end of the 19th Century, the organisation of societal interests intensified in non-state institutions, albeit often those closely linked to the state. Their roles were manifold: the creation of regulations and guidelines, social and financial self-help, ensuring education and quality standards, ensuring professional discipline, sometimes implementing the sovereign authority of the state. To a large extent, however, self-regulation institutions also acted as institutions in which conflicts were argued out in a formal process – conflicts which were not delivered to state jurisdiction or in which the state only acted as a secondary authority. Usually operating as resolution, arbitration or conciliation boards, these institutions had a variety of forms: They could be located within an existing organisation (e.g. courts of arbitration in professional associations) or created for conflicts between different organisations (e.g. arbitration boards for disputes resulting from deficiency contracts between the umbrella organisations of banks, building societies and credit unions) or be set up by the authorities but staffed by representatives of societal groups (e.g. rental arbitration offices).

Although familiar, these forms of conflict resolution have so far hardly been appraised from the point of view of legal history.

The project is designed to close this research gap and examine this kind of institution, including as an alternative model to the state monopoly on jurisdiction (and to the administrative state monopoly on decision-making). The most attention will be paid to the question of the extent to which, through the way such institutions functioned, the interaction between the state’s ambitions of control and the efforts of sectors of society to maintain self-organisation were realised.

Publications

1.
Collin, P.: Ehrengerichtliche Rechtsprechung im Kaiserreich und der Weimarer Republik: Multinormativität in einer mononormativen Rechtsordnung? Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History Rg 25, pp. 138 - 150 (2017)
2.
Collin, P.: Schwurgerichte und andere Formen der Laienbeteiligung: staatsfremde Normativitäten und gesellschaftliche Selbstregulierung im staatlichen Organisationsgehäuse ? In: Justice without the State within the State: Judicial Self-Regulation in the Past and Present, pp. 223 - 241 (Ed. Collin, P.). Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main (2016)
3.
Collin, P.: Vom Richten zum Schlichten – juristische Entscheidungssysteme im Umbruch. Außergerichtliche Konfliktlösung im späten 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 36, pp. 112 - 138 (2016)
4.
Collin, P.: Das Berliner Abkommen von 1913 im Spannungsfeld rechtshistorischer Entwicklungstendenzen. Vierteljahresschrift für Sozialrecht 32, pp. 173 - 194 (2014)
5.
Collin, P.: Konzeptionen, Spielarten und Wechselbeziehungen administrativer und justizieller Autonomie in Deutschland im späten 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Quaderni fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno 43, pp. 165 - 228 (2014)
6.
Collin, P.: Judging and Conciliation – Differentiations and Complementarities. (2013)
7.
Collin, P.: Richten und Schlichten: Differenzen und Komplementaritäten. (2012)
 
loading content
Go to Editor View